Publication Ethics

Editorial Policies
Publication Ethics
Ethical principles and responsibilities governing the publication process of CORISINTA.

Journal of Computer Science and Technology Application (CORISINTA) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication of an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer, and the publisher CORIS .

This statement is based on the previous COPE’s Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the current COPE's Core Practices .

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of scholarly articles in the Journal of Computer Science and Technology Application (CORISINTA), a peer-reviewed journal, plays a pivotal role in establishing a coherent and esteemed knowledge network. This process serves as a direct representation of the authors' work and the institutions endorsing them, contributing to the advancement of scientific understanding.

Peer-reviewed articles within CORISINTA serve as a manifestation of the rigorous scientific method. As such, it is imperative to establish and adhere to standardized ethical principles for all stakeholders involved in the publication process: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society at large.

Publisher and Editor

CORIS as publisher of Journal of Computer Science and Technology Application (CORISINTA) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities.

CORISINTA is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decisions

The editor is responsible for deciding which submitted articles should be published. Decisions are based on the validation, significance, and importance of the work, while considering journal policies and applicable legal requirements regarding copyright infringement, plagiarism, and related matters.

Fair Play

Manuscripts are evaluated based on their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff must not disclose information about submitted manuscripts except to authorized authors, reviewers, editorial advisers, and the publisher.

Disclosure & Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials from submitted manuscripts must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Complaints Policy

We aim to respond to and resolve all complaints quickly and constructively. The procedures followed by CORISINTA aim to be fair and balanced for those making complaints and for those being complained about. Complaints can be submitted by email. All complaints will be acknowledged within five working days.

Duties of Reviewers
Responsibilities and ethical standards for peer reviewers
1
Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and may also assist authors in improving their manuscripts.

2
Promptness

Reviewers who feel unqualified or unable to complete a review promptly should notify the editor and excuse themselves from the process.

3
Confidentiality

Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be discussed or shared except as authorized by the editor.

4
Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism is inappropriate, and reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

5
Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited and inform the editor of substantial similarities or overlap with other published work.

6
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must remain confidential and must not be used for personal advantage. Reviewers should decline manuscripts where conflicts of interest exist.

Duties of Authors
Responsibilities and ethical standards for authors
01   Reporting Standards

Authors should present an accurate account of the work performed and an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately, with sufficient detail and references to permit replication. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements are unacceptable.

02   Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide raw data for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access where practicable and retain data for a reasonable period after publication.

03   Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should ensure that their work is original and that any work or words of others are appropriately cited or quoted.

04   Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

Authors should not publish essentially the same research in more than one journal or submit the same manuscript to multiple journals concurrently.

05   Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have influenced the nature of the reported work.

06   Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All appropriate co-authors should be included, while inappropriate authorship should be avoided. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript and agreed to its submission.

07   Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Authors should disclose financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that could influence the results or interpretation of the manuscript. All sources of financial support should also be disclosed.

08   Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in a published work, the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to correct or retract the paper.

CORISINTA Publication Ethics
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Application